← AI Tools / AI Governance Gap Finder

Governance Intelligence

Structured self-assessment artifact · Three-Layer Protocol · v0.1

AI Governance Gap Finder

Where are the gaps between your governance policies and practice?

A 6-dimension diagnostic built on the Three-Layer Assessment Protocol — Self-Report, Evidence, and Behavioral Observation. The gap between layers 1 and 3 is the Enacted Gap: the governance maturity signal that lives in behavior, not in binders.

Behavioral Governance framework — six dimensions including Decision Rights and Governance Intelligence
Your answers are not stored. This assessment runs entirely in your browser and downloads to you.

DIMENSION 1 OF 6

Decision Rights

Three-layer assessment: Self-Report → Evidence → Behavioral Observation

LAYER 1 · SELF-REPORT

How clearly defined are the roles and authorities for approving, modifying, or terminating AI initiatives?

Not at allCompletely

LAYER 2 · EVIDENCE

Does a current, dated document specify who can approve AI pilots, production deployments, and shutdowns?

LAYER 3 · BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION

In the last AI initiative launched, was the documented approval path actually followed?

All AI Tools → Discuss this with Paul →

STAY IN THE LOOP

See how the benchmarks develop

I share insights as data accumulates — what separates high scorers, framework updates, and research on AI adoption. No noise.

Subscribe on Substack →